此页面上的内容需要较新版本的 Adobe Flash Player。

获取 Adobe Flash Player

Correction of Dynamic Error Result from Measurement System Limitations

Zhi-jie ZHANG(张志杰), Dai-hua WANG(王代华), Wen-lian WANG(王文廉) , Wei WANG(王巍)

 

Key Lab of Instrumentation Science and Dynamic Testing(Ministry o f Education), North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China)

 

Abstract-The main cause of dynamic errors is due to frequency  response limitation of measurement system. One way of solving this problem is de signing an effective inverse filter. Since the problem is ill-conditioned, a sm all uncertainty in the measurement will cause large deviation in reconstructed s ignals. The amplified noise has to be suppressed at the sacrifice of biasing in  estimation. The paper presents a kind of designing method of inverse filter in f requency domain based on stabilized solutions of Fredholm integral equations of  the first kind in order to reduce dynamic errors. Compared with previous several  work, the method has advantage of generalization. Simulations with different Si gnal-to-Noise ratio (SNR) are investigated. Flexibility of the method is verif ied. Application of correcting dynamic error is given.

 

Key words-dynamic error; inverse filters; correction of  dynamic characteristic; measurement system

 

Manuscript Number: 1674-8042(2010)04-0307-05

 

dio: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8042.2010.04.01


References

 

[1]Zhi-jie Zhang, 1998.  The Confidence Level of Measured Data of Sing le Process in Dynamic Measurement: Study on Environmental Factor and Inverse Fil tering Method, Doctoral Dissertation, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing.

[2]P. B. Crilly, 1991. A quantitative evaluation of various iterative d econvolution algorithms. IEEE Trans. on Instrum. and Meas.,   40(3): 558-562.

[3]Yan-da Li, Jun Chang, 1991. Signal Reconstruction Theory and its Ap plications, Tsinghua University Press, p.135-138.

[4]S. M. Riad, R. B. Stafford, 1980. Impulse Response Evaluation using  Frequency Domain Optimal Compensation Deconvolution. Proc. 23rd Midwest Symp. on  Circuits and Systems, Toledo, OH, p. 521-525.

[5]N. S. Nahman, M. E. Guillaume, 1981. Deconvolution of Time Domain Wa veforms in the Presence of Noise. NBS Tech. Note 1047, NBS Boulder, CO.

[6]Tamas Daboczi, Istran Kollar, 1996. Multiparameter optimization of i nverse filtering algorithms. IEEE Trans. on Instrum. and Meas., 45(2): 417-421.

[7]G. N. Solopchenko, 1987. Inverse problems in measurement.  Measurement, 5(1): 10-19.

[8]B. Parruck, S. M. Riad, 1983. An optimization criterion for iterativ e deconvolution. IEEE Trans. on Instrum. and Meas., IM-32(1) : 137-140.

[9]Sun Shenghe, 1989. Modern Measurement in the Time Domain. Harbin Ind ustry University Press, p. 84-93.

[10]A. N. Tikhonov, V. Y. Arsenin, 1977. Solution of Ill-Posed Problem s, Wiley, New York.

[11]K. Miller, 1970. Least squares methods for ill-posed problems with  a prescribed bound. SIAM J. Math Anal., 1: 52-74,

[12]Ke-jun Xu, Cheng Li, Zhi-neng Zhu, 2007. Dynamic modeling and com pensation of robot six-axis wrist force/torque sensor. IEEE Trans. on  Instrum. and Meas., 56(5): 2094-2100.

[13]Marco P. Schoen, 2007. Dynamic compensation of intelligent sensors.  IEEE Trans. on Instrum. and Meas., 56(5): 1992-2001.

[14]Claudio Narduzzi, 2005. Inverse filtering with signal-adaptive con straints. IEEE Trans. on Instrum. and Meas., 54(4): 1992-200 1.

[15]Shi-xiong Li, Jia-qi Liu, 1994. Wavelet Transform and Ma-themati c Groundwork to Inverse Problem, Geological Publishing Company.

[16]Zhi-jie Zhang, Jing Zu, Hong-mian Du, An-shi Chen, 2007. Correct ion of signal distortion resulting from measurement systems limitation. The Journal of Measurement Science, 2(2): 65-71.

[17]Zhi-jie Zhang, et al, 2008. A Group of Inverse Filters Based on St abilized Solutions of Fredholm Integral Equations of the First Kind. IEEE Intern ational Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Victoria, Vancouv er Island, Canada, 2008.

 

[full text view]