此页面上的内容需要较新版本的 Adobe Flash Player。

获取 Adobe Flash Player

An effective method for performance evaluation of ACLS based on improved grey analytic hierarchy

LI Yan, YIN Haitao


(Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Testing Technology Research Institute, Xi’an 710025, China)


Abstract: The performance evaluation of automatic carrier landing system (ACLS) is an important part in the field of carrier aircraft landing control. Combining grey analytic hierarchy theory and data normalization theory,  an improved grey analytic hierarchy method is introduced to evaluate the performance of ACLS. A complete performance evaluation indicators system of ACLS is established, and the definition and calculation formula of each indicator are provided. The grey analytic hierarchy model is modified to improve the real-time performance of the algorithm, where traditional expert scoring sampling matrix is substituted by an indicator normalized sample matrix. Taking a certain ACLS as an example, the experimental simulation is carried out, and the simulation results verify the reliability and the accuracy of the improved grey analytic hierarchy method. 

Key words:automatic carrier landing system (ACLS);  evaluation indicators system;  grey analytic hierarchy model;  normalization sample matrix


References


[1]WANG G H, XU G D, XIE Y P, et al. Effectiveness evaluation of UCAV air combat based on battlefield environment. Command Control & Simulation, 2018, 40(4): 70-73.

[2]LIU D Y, SUN P, ZHANG J Y. Integrated operational capability evaluation of flghter aircraft based on GAHP. Command Control & Simulation, 2019, 41(5): 65-69.

[3]CHEN N T, ZHANG H Y, CAO Y K. Prediction of approaching landing unsafe events based on grey Markov method. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2020, 50(4): 306-314.

[4]WANG X J, JIAO X H, CHU J. Assessment technology study about landing approach suitability of carrier-based aircraft abroad. Aeronautical Science and Technology, 2015(1): 12-16.

[5]HU X B, ZHOU D P, QU X L. Review on full automatic carrier landing technique of foreign shipboard aircraft. Aircraft Design, 2021, 41(2): 32-36.

[6]ZHANG Y, WANG S C, YANG K. Analysis and evaluation of carrier-based aircraft landing process. Engineering & Test, 2016, 56(1): 25-28, 72.

[7]ZHANG L H. Operational efficiency evaluation of air-to-air weapon system by grey analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Sichuan Ordnance, 2015, 36(9): 154-157.

[8]YANG Y, ZHANG X C, LIU Z L, et al. Plateau environment adaptability evaluation of flight support equipment based on grey-fuzzy theoty. Journal of Academy of Armored Force Engineering, 2016, 30(4): 30-34.

[9]XU W B. A comprehensive evaluation method for carrier landing based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2013(2): 17-21.

[10]GU L J, LONG H B, SUN H J. Indicator system for safety evaluation of shipboard helicopter system. Journal of Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, 2013(5): 533-538.

[11]YIN H T, LI Y. Analysis of evaluation indicator system for carrier landing control system. Science and Technology Innovation Herald. 2016(20): 11-13.

[12]WANG L F, XU S B. Introduction to AHP. Beijing: China Renmin University Press Co. LTD, 1990.

[13]ZHANG L J, YUAN N W. Comparison and selection of indicator standardization method in linear comprehensive evaluation model. Statistics & Information Forum, 2010, 25(8): 10-15.

[14]YIN H T. Research on control system for carrier aircraft landing based on flight/thrust integrated system. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2014.  


改进灰色层次法对舰载机自动着舰系统性能的评估


李  艳, 尹海韬


(西安航天动力测控技术研究所, 陕西 西安 710025)


摘  要:    舰载机自动着舰系统性能评估是舰载机着舰控制技术领域的一个重要部分。 结合灰色层次评估理论与数据归一化的特点, 提出了一种新的灰色层次评估方法, 用于对自动着舰系统性能进行评估。 建立了完整的自动着舰系统性能评价指标体系, 并给出各指标的定义和计算公式。 为提高算法的实时性,  给出了改进的灰色层次分析模型, 改进后的模型以指标归一化样本矩阵代替传统的专家打分样本矩阵。 以某自动着舰系统为例进行评估仿真, 实验结果证明改进后的灰色层次评估方法具有优异的可靠性和准确性。

关键词: 着舰控制系统; 评价指标体系; 灰色层次模型; 归一化样本矩阵  


引用格式:LI Yan, YIN Haitao. An effective method for performance evaluation of ACLS based on improved grey analytic hierarchy. Journal of Measurement Science and Instrumentation, 2022, 13(2):166-172.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8042.2022.02.005


[full text view]