XU Peng1， WANG Yonghuan2
（1. School of Science, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China；
2. School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology， Beijing 100081， China）
Abstract： The aluminum matrix syntactic foam was fabricated by pressure infiltration technique， and the filling material is syntactic foam material with fly ash cenosphere as the main component and polyurethane foam as the binder. Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) dynamic compression and quasi-static tests were carried out to examine the compressive response of syntactic foam in this study. Then the dynamic constitutive model was established. Results show that the compressive stress-strain curve of syntactic aluminum foam is similar to that of other metallic foam materials: both kinds of aluminum matrix syntactic foams have strain rate effect, and the syntactic foam has higher compressive strength and energy absorption than the same density aluminum foams. However, due to the different sizes of cenospheres, the dynamic compression results of two kinds of syntactic foams are different, and the energy absorption effect of syntactic foam with small size under dynamic impact is the best. In the range of strain rate and density studied experimentally, the curves of constitutive model fit well with the curves of experimental data.
Key words： fly ash cenosphere； polyurethane； composite foam aluminum； strain rate effect； mechanical property； constitutive model
References
［1］Deshpande V S, Fleck N A. High strain rate compressive behavior of aluminum alloy foams. International Journal of Impact Engineering， 2000， 24(3)： 277-298.
［2］Mukai T， Kanahashi H， Miyoshi T， et al. Experimental study of energy absorption in a close-celled aluminum foam under dynamic loading. Scripta Materialia， 1999， 40(8)： 921-927.
［3］Cheng H F， Huang X M， Xu L. Influence of TIG dressing on microstructure and fracture toughness of welding joint. Ordnance Material Science and Engineering， 2003， 26(5)： 37-43.
［4］Dukhan N， Rayess N E， Hadley J. Characterization of aluminum foam-polypropylene interpenetrating phase composites： flexural test results. Mechanical Materials， 2010， 42(2)： 134-141.
［5］Yuan Z Y， Rayess N E， Dukhan N. Modeling of the mechanical properties of a polymer-metal foam hybrid. Procedia Materials Science， 2014, 4： 215 - 219.
［6］Li Y G， Wei Y H， Hou L F， et al. Fabrication and compressive behavior of an aluminum foam composite. Journal of Alloy Compound, 2015, 649： 76-81.
［7］Lin S， Feng Y， Cha H B， et al. Compression capability and energy absorption of foam aluminum cylinder sandwich with silicone rubber. Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals， 2007, 17(10)： 1672-1677.
［8］Cheng H F， Han F S. Compressive behavior and energy absorbing characteristic of open cellaluminum foam filled with silicate rubber. Scripta Materials, 2003, 49： 583-586.
［9］Jhaver R， Tippur H. Processing， compression response and finite element modeling of syntactic foam based interpenetrating phase composite (IPC). Materials Science & Engineering A， 2009， 499： 507-517.
［10］Daoud A， Effect of fly ash addition on the structure and compressive properties of 4032-fly ash particle composite foams. Journal of Alloys & Compounds， 2009， 487 (1/2)： 618-625.
［11］Mondal D P， Jha N， Gull B， et al. Micro architecture and compressive deformation behavior of Al-alloy (LM13)-cenosphere hybrid Al-foam prepared using CaCO3 as foaming agent. Materials Science & Engineering A， 2013， 560(2)： 601-610.
［12］Periasamy C， Jhaver R， Tippur H V. Quasi-static and dynamic compression response of a lightweight interpenetrating phase composite foam. Materials Science & Engineering A， 2010， 527(12)： 2845-2856.
［13］Periasamy C， Tippur H V. Experimental measurements and numerical modeling of dynamic compression response of an interpenetrating phase composite foam. Mechanics Research Communications， 2012， 43： 57-65.
［14］Zou L C， Zhang Q， Pang B J， et al. Dynamic compressive behavior of aluminum matrix syntactic foam and its multilayer structure. Materials & Design， 2013， 45： 555-560.
［15］Goel M D， Mondal D P， Yadav M S， et al. Effect of strain rate and relative density on compressive deformation behavior of aluminum cenosphere syntactic foam. Materials Science & Engineering A， 2014， 590(1)： 406-415.
［16］Sherwood J A, Frost C C . Constitutive modeling and simulation of energy absorbing polyurethane foam under impact loading (p 1138-1146). Polymer Engineering & Science， 2010， 32(16)： 1138-1146.
［17］Hu Y L， Wang F C， Hu S S. An empirical dynamic constitutive model for aluminum foams and its implemention in LS-DYNA. National Conference on Computational Explosive Mechanics, 2012.
［18］Wang P F， Xu S L， Hu S S. A constitutive relation of aluminum foam coupled with temperatureand strain rate. Journal of High Pressure Physics， 2014， 28(1)： 23-28.
［19］Jeong K Y, Cheon S S, Munshi M B. A constitutive model for polyurethane foam with strain rate sensitivity. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology， 2012， 26(7)： 2033-2038.
［20］Liu Q, Subhash G, Gao X L. A parametric study on crushability of open-cell structural polymeric foams. Journal of Porous Materials， 2005， 12(3)： 233-248.
［21］Zhang Y， Chen L， Chen R J， et al. Dynamic mechanical property experiment and constitutive model establishment of polyurethane foam aluminum. Explosion and Shock Waves， 2014， 34(3)： 373-378.
［22］Miltz J， Gruenbaum G. Evaluation of cushioning properties of plastic foams from compressivemeasurements. Polymer Engineering & Science， 1981， 21(15)： 1010-1014.
［23］Paul A， Ramamurthy U. Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam. Materials Science & Engineering A， 2000， 281(1)： 1-7.
［24］Wang Z H. Studies on the dynamic mechanical properties and energy absorption of aluminum alloy foams. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology， 2005： 41-42.
［25］Wang P F， Xu S L， Li Z B， et al. Experimental investigation on the strain-rate and inertia effect of closed-cell aluminum foam subjected to dynamic loading. Materials Science & Engineering A， 2015， 620(1)： 253-261.
［26］Goel M D, Peroni M, Solomos G, et al. Dynamic compression behavior of cenosphere aluminum alloy syntactic foam. Materials & Design， 2012， 42： 418-423
粉煤灰漂珠/聚氨酯复合泡沫铝材料压缩性能与本构关系研究
徐鹏1， 王永欢2
（1. 中北大学 理学院， 山西 太原 030051；2. 北京理工大学 宇航学院， 北京 100081）
摘要:采用压力渗透法制备出了铝基复合泡沫材料， 填充材料是以粉煤灰漂珠为主要组分、硬质聚氨酯泡沫为粘结剂的复合泡沫材料。 通过准静态实验和分离式霍普金森压杆（Split Hopkinson pressure bar, SHPB）动态压缩的方法研究了复合泡沫铝的压缩力学响应， 然后建立了动态本构关系。 研究表明， 复合泡沫铝的压缩应力-应变曲线与其它泡沫材料的应力-应变曲线类似， 文中的两种铝基复合泡沫具有应变率效应， 复合泡沫铝较密度相近未填充前的泡沫铝基具有更高的压缩强度与能量吸收能力。 但由于漂珠尺寸的不同， 导致两种复合泡沫铝的动态压缩结果不尽相同， 且小颗粒复合泡沫铝在动态冲击下吸能效果最好。 在本研究实验的应变率和密度范围内， 本文建立的本构模型曲线与实验曲线吻合较好。
关键词:粉煤灰漂珠； 聚氨酯； 复合泡沫铝； 应变率效应； 力学性能； 本构模型
引用格式：XU Peng， WANG Yonghuan. Compression behavior and constitutive model establishment of fly ash cenosphere/polyurethane aluminum alloy syntactic foam. Journal of Measurement Science and Instrumentation, 2021, 12（3）： 369-378. DOI： 10．3969／j．issn．1674-8042．2021．03．016
[full text view]
