此页面上的内容需要较新版本的 Adobe Flash Player。

获取 Adobe Flash Player

Research on relationship between leakage of incompressible fluid and pressure change in pipeline

YANG Li1, ZENG Zhoumo1, FENG Hao1, HE Yongfang2, GAO Chao2


(1. State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;2. Tianjin Jingyijingce Technology Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300000, China)


Abstract: In practical engineering, only pressure sensors are allowed to install to detect leakage in most of oil transportation pipelines, while flowmeters are only installed at the toll ports. For incompressible fluid, the leakage rate and amount cannot be accurately calculated through critical pressure conditions. In this paper, a micro-element body of the pipeline was intercepted for calculation. The relationship between radial displacement and pressure of pipe wall was studied based on the stress-strain equation. Then, the strain response of pipeline volume with pipeline pressure was obtained. The change in volume expansion of pipeline was used to characterize leakage of incompressible fluid. Finally, the calculation model of leakage amount of incompressible fluid was obtained. To verify the above theory, the pipeline expansion model under pressure was established by COMSOL software for simulation. Both simulation results and deduction equations show that the volumetric change has a quadratic parabolic relationship with the change of pipeline pressure. However, the relationship between them can be approximately linear when the pressure change is not too large. In addition, the leakage of incompressible fluid under the pressure of 0 MPa-0.8 MPa was obtained by experiments. The experimental results verify the linear relationship between leakage of incompressible fluid and the change of pipeline pressure. The theoretical and experimental results provide a basis for the calculation of leakage of incompressible fluid in the pipeline.


Key words: incompressible fluid; volumetric strain; finite element simulation; pressure gradient; leakage

References


[1]Luo Y, Zhang Y. Test and simulation on pressure response of gas pipiline hole-leak. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2014, 10(2): 11-15.
[2]Wang L M. Key emergency technology research on the leakage of long distance pipeline. Beijing:  Beijing University of Technology, 2012:  1-13.
[3]Sun J F, Li Y S, Liang Y T. Progress of research on leakage rate model of gas pipeline. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2020, 39(5):  512-518.
[4]Han G J. Research on the leakage of buried gas pipeline and diffusion regularity. Chongqing:  Chongqing University, 2014: 1-9, 28-33.
[5]Zhou Z X, Zhou J N, Jin F N, et al. Calculation and analysis of buried gas pipeline leakage. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 18(3): 243-248.
[6]Liu B, You Z P, Deng J J. One-dimensional carbon dioxide pipe full hole fracture model. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(6):  2174-2181.
[7]Williams P T, Bass B R, Dickson T L, et al. Leapor:  a computer code for leakage-rate calculations for cracks in cooling water piping systems. In: Proceedings of American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 2017:  16-20.
[8]Bi K. CFD simulation analysis and experimental study of high pressure pipeline leakage. Beijing:  North China Electric Power University, 2017:  7-12.
[9]Venturino P, Otegui J L, Teutónico M. Gas pipeline leakage in urban subsurface soil. In: Proceedings of International Congress on Metallurgy & Materials, Rosario, AR, Argentina, 2013:  289-296.
[10]Wu Q, Jiang P, Leng S R, et al. Study on improved algorithm of leaking velocity in long-distance CNG pipe accident. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(9):  38-42.
[11]Wang X Y, Du M P, Wang T, et al. Numerical simulation of leakage of gas from buried pipeline and its diffusion process. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(2):  45-50.
[12]Zhang L K, Niu A F, Huang F Q. Calculation of rock compressive pressure transfer coefficient and its influence mechanism. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 2018, 39(1): 102-106.
[13]Shi D, Lin G Q. Finite element analysis of structural design on hydraulic cylinder. Journal of Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, 2016, 33(11):  50-54.
[14]Li M H, Li Q J, Zhang L F, et al. Finite element analysis and calculation of stress and deformation of long distance pipeline under the influence of thermal stress and external pressure. In:  Proceedings of 20th Technical Exchange Meeting of Petroleum and Natural Gas Exploration Technology Center Station, Taiyuan, 2012: 87-91.
[15]Shui X L. Stress and strain analysis of wall pit in gas transmission pipeline. Gas & Heat, 2018, 38(12):  6-8.
[16]Zhen L L, Xu J Y. Research on stress analysis and strain design of oil and gas transmission pipelines. Science & Technology Information, 2015, 13(7): 241.


管道不可压缩流体泄漏量与压力变化的关系研究


杨  丽1, 曾周末1, 封  皓1, 贺永方2, 高  潮2


(1. 天津大学 精密测试技术及仪器国家重点实验室, 天津 300072;2. 天津精仪精测科技有限公司, 天津 300000)


摘  要:   实际工程中, 大多数的石油运输管道只允许安装压力传感器检测泄漏情况, 流量计仅安装在收费口处, 而且对于不可压缩流体无法通过临界压力条件计算泄漏量。 基于应力应变公式, 通过研究管道的微元体受压时管壁的径向位移与管内压强的关系, 得出管道体积随管道压力的应变响应。 以管道容积膨胀的改变量表征管道中不可压缩流体的泄漏量, 得到不可压缩流体的泄漏量计算模型。 建立管道受压膨胀的COMSOL模型进行仿真验证, 仿真结果和推导公式均表明: 管道的体积应变与管道压力呈二次抛物线关系, 但当管道内压力变化不大时, 二者之间可近似为线性关系。 此外, 建立实验平台得到了压力为0 MPa~0.8 MPa时的泄漏量, 验证了不可压缩流体与压力变化之间的线性关系。 理论和实验结果为管道内不可压缩流体泄漏量的计算提供了理论依据。


关键词:   不可压缩流体; 体积应变; 有限元仿真; 压力梯度; 泄漏量

引用格式:  YANG Li, ZENG Zhoumo, FENG Hao, et al. Research on relationship between leakage of incompressible fluid and pressure change in pipeline. Journal of Measurement Science and Instrumentation, 2021, 12(2): 146-153. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8042.2021.01.003


[full text view]